Thursday, 21 July 2011

IN THE MIDST OF LIFE by Jennifer Worth


This is a maudlin and poorly written book that makes an unexpectedly good point.

The book is intended to question the way western culture deals with imminent death. The author begins with an account of her grandfather's death, which happened gently, and at home, and contrasts this with the deaths she frequently saw as a nurse. It is very common apparently for elderly people to end their lives in a great deal of pain, over an extended period, because doctors feel driven by a fear of litigation to extend life, even if only for a few days, by very painful, invasive procedures.

She gives many examples of elderly or terminally ill persons forced through many weeks or even months of great pain because their carers felt unable to simply let the person go gently. Unfortunately, we do not need many examples to understand her case; one or two would have been quite sufficient. As it is, the book degenerates into a rather sentimental, even morbid, succession of stories of people dying in horrible conditions. I'm not going to say I didn't spend some of the book in tears, but this owes less to the quality of the writing than to the quality of this reader: I am a giant wimp.

I wish the book had involved more examination into how this state of affairs had developed, because where she briefly looks at this it becomes much more interesting. For example, there is some discussion of the fact that in long term care facilities, it is normal for dementia patients to have a feeding tube inserted into their stomachs. You might think this is because they cannot eat, but you'd be wrong. The tubes are inserted because it saves carers fifteen minutes for each patient – they do not have to spoon their food into their mouths, but can just pour it down the tube.

7 comments:

  1. interesting points, especially the last paragraph on saving time. It also brings to mind the age-old argument about euthanasia.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Eeh this doesn't sound like something I would be able to read. It sounds like the book tries to bring up some interesting points but perhaps doesn't do it so well sadly.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Enjoyed your review, Sarah. I loved your observation - "poorly written book that makes an unexpectedly good point" :) It is so beautiful :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes, she is quite interesting about euthenasia. She points out that we are all living a lot longer - and will soon all live past 100 - so we are going to have to get serious about death choices . .

    ReplyDelete
  5. Am reading this book now, I did not want to, but it came into my life so had to be faced. I consider it to be very well written and it is changing some of my previously firmly held opinions. The chapter about the Carers, their measly pay and poorly constructed qualifications I know to be correct and should worry us all.

    Until reading this book I was blissfully unaware of the problems with resuscitation of the sick and elderly. I needed this information as I have a dearly loved sister in her seventies who has profound learning disabilities and breast cancer.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes, I agree with you. It certainly gives us some important information that ought to be more widely known. I am very sorry to hear your sister is unwell!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree too. I think it's very well written. I loved her other books, thought they were great fun and a good read and learned some stuff too. This book,though, made me think - really think. I'm glad I read it.

    ReplyDelete

BEL CANTO by Ann Pratchett

This sounded like it was going to be good: 50 wealthy people taken hostage and held by terrorists for four months in a ballroom. But I foun...